Upon consulting reader 5:
Professional Ethics and reading the section on “Theoretical Approaches to
Ethics” I have realised that several of the Ethics I have previously talked
about fit in to the three approaches outlined “Consequentialist”, “Deontologist”
and “Virtue Ethicist”.
As I stated in part 5b, equality
and diversity is at the forefront of everything we deliver at Hertford Regional
College. If I were to summarize equality
and diversity into the three approaches I would take the approach of actually
imbedding it into the curriculum that I am to teach. I am going to place what I
feel I have learnt in a similar table as the one on page 8 of the reader:
Approaches to imbedding equality and diversity within a classroom based
lesson
Consequentialist
|
Deontologist
|
Virtue
Ethicist
|
Imbedding equality and diversity into the
curriculum will make students more aware of many different cultures,
religions, sexual orientation etc. and make them value the diversity within
the world.
|
Imbedding equality and diversity in the
curriculum will offend if not delivered correctly. Also may single out
people.
|
Imbedding equality and diversity into the curriculum
is morally right when approached in the correct way and will also enlighten
the views of others. It is also intended to make people “Aware”.
|
This approach can also be taken with safeguarding as actions that have to be taken within safeguarding could be viewed as being acceptable for a rightful cause, the approach towards the occurring matter could be seen as wrong and the intentions of the action would be clear.
As I read the reader further and
read about “Professional Ethics” on page 13, I realised that the Health and
Safety code of practice fit into this. It states in the reader:
“Some
professions have developed licences to practice and have professional bodies to
oversee that codes and ethics are being adhered to. The ultimate censure is
removal of the licence to practice... Professionally, there can be tensions
between personal ethics and professional codes and employer expectations”.
This statement seems to me to be
the perfect definition of health and safety. People have a different work ethic
within health and safety, there may be a certain way to do something that is
specifically put across in training, however the person actually doing the work
may feel it is safer to take a different approach. Personally I have been in
many health and safety training sessions that have lead to a debate, but at the
end of it all, it is the “Professional Code” that always wins.
This approach would also relate to
equality and diversity as I feel that there is no correct approach to this
ethic, it will always be a delicate subject, hence why the College I work for
have codes of practice in place.
Dear Dan,
ReplyDeleteEmbedding equality is one aspect of ethics, but there are others, not least the ethical consideration given to you as a practitioner. I think it is really important to see ethics as a branch of philosophy that has many links and consequences, not just a code of practice. I’d be interested to hear your views on the ethics in relation say to workers rights?